Christian quoter

Welcome to Mobiforumz.com. then start blogging ur own wap site!


Free Mp3’s 4 Ur Mobile


Free Full Games 4 Ur Mobile


Free Mobile Applications


Free RingTones 4 mobiles

BBC reports, “Plans to cut red tape and make it easier to build home extensions are expected to be announced by Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly next week.
A White Paper will propose an “impact” test for developments which would currently require planning permission. Under the proposals, such developments would no longer need permission where there is little impact on neighbours. ”

The BBC fails to report that no-one needs planning permission for anything provided what is done complies with curent planning law. This is because under English common law everything not forbidden is permitted. So if the planning law does not prohibit what you are going to do you are at liberty to do it. You do not have to ask permission to obey any law. Contrast this with European law where everything is forbidden unless the law allows it.

It is disgusting and the perpetrators should suffer the due penalties. However, the lady in question could protect herself in a very simple way; dress that integrates with the majority culture. My wife does it in Islamic countries as my blog evidences if you look for Afghanistan. I suggest Muslim women should do so here. It can be done with modesty and will promote harmony.

Did you see it reported yesterday that a high court judge aged 59 did not know what a web site was? Where does the Lord Chancellor get them from? Burke and Hare?

Waiting for a bus outside the local station I noticed I was the only white among a dozen or more in the queue. Then I started observing cars passing. I counted 50 before the bus came and I saw no whites in them. On the bus I was quite taken aback. 3 whites out of 16 travellers.

First day of the first test of the year was delayed by rain then spoiled by bad light decisions. I only saw 48 overs for my £40.I left at 5pm when they went off yet again for the light. I had to visit Katy in hospital recovering from back surgery. Only 8 more overs were bowled.Colleymore bowls at Cook.
Cook finished the day 102 not out. I also saw him make a century here on day one against Pakistan last year.
The Queen arrived just before tea and straight away they were off for the light.
She met the teams. I am pleased to get these from right across the ground.

What the apologists seem to miss, however, is that, even if their watered-down, made-to-accord-with-the-West version of Islam is more authentic, that doesn’t really change a thing. Repudiating the validity of “literalist” interpretations of the Koran is totally beside the point. The issue isn’t which “version” of Islam is “correct.” The issue is that there are Muslims who have interpreted, do interpret, and always will interpret the mandates of Islam literally. As long as the Koran contains a plenitude of verses commanding Muslims to be in a perpetual state of war with non-Muslims (e.g., Koran 9:5, 9:29, 9:123), to “strike terror into the hearts of infidels” and “to strike their heads off” (Koran 8:60 and 47:4), all with assurances that “Allah has purchased the lives and possessions of the Believers in exchange for paradise: they fight in his cause, slaying and being slain” (9:111) — there will always be those faithful (Ramadan’s “minority of literalists”) who take these words for what they plainly mean.

Thus, even if we were to agree with Ramadan that the vast majority of Muslims are “moderates” and that, say, only a mere 20 percent of Muslims are “literalists,” that simply means that some 200 million Muslims in the world today are dedicated enemies of the infidel West. At any rate, when it comes to instilling terror, numbers are of no significance. It took only 19 to wreak great havoc and destruction on American soil on 9/11. It won’t take much more to duplicate that horrific day. This is precisely why, to use Ramadan’s own words, “we are obsessed by the few [radical Muslims] and not seeing the many [moderate Muslims].” That most Muslims are good, law-abiding citizens and that only a mere minority of the umma, say, 200 million, are hell-bent on destroying the West — how is that supposed to be any comfort to us? - Raymond Ibrahim

What the apologists seem to miss, however, is that, even if their watered-down, made-to-accord-with-the-West version of Islam is more authentic, that doesn’t really change a thing. Repudiating the validity of “literalist” interpretations of the Koran is totally beside the point. The issue isn’t which “version” of Islam is “correct.” The issue is that there are Muslims who have interpreted, do interpret, and always will interpret the mandates of Islam literally. As long as the Koran contains a plenitude of verses commanding Muslims to be in a perpetual state of war with non-Muslims (e.g., Koran 9:5, 9:29, 9:123), to “strike terror into the hearts of infidels” and “to strike their heads off” (Koran 8:60 and 47:4), all with assurances that “Allah has purchased the lives and possessions of the Believers in exchange for paradise: they fight in his cause, slaying and being slain” (9:111) — there will always be those faithful (Ramadan’s “minority of literalists”) who take these words for what they plainly mean.

Thus, even if we were to agree with Ramadan that the vast majority of Muslims are “moderates” and that, say, only a mere 20 percent of Muslims are “literalists,” that simply means that some 200 million Muslims in the world today are dedicated enemies of the infidel West. At any rate, when it comes to instilling terror, numbers are of no significance. It took only 19 to wreak great havoc and destruction on American soil on 9/11. It won’t take much more to duplicate that horrific day. This is precisely why, to use Ramadan’s own words, “we are obsessed by the few [radical Muslims] and not seeing the many [moderate Muslims].” That most Muslims are good, law-abiding citizens and that only a mere minority of the umma, say, 200 million, are hell-bent on destroying the West — how is that supposed to be any comfort to us? - Raymond Ibrahim

BBC says The Eurovision Song Contest voting system needs to be changed because it is “harmful to the relationship between the peoples of Europe”, an MP has said.
Countries voted for their neighbours rather than the best songs, Liberal Democrat MP Richard Younger-Ross said.

Come on. get real. Europe hates us, especially because of Iraq and we hate the E.U. The sooner we are out of stupid Union and Contest the better.

BBC says The Eurovision Song Contest voting system needs to be changed because it is “harmful to the relationship between the peoples of Europe”, an MP has said.
Countries voted for their neighbours rather than the best songs, Liberal Democrat MP Richard Younger-Ross said.

Come on. get real. Europe hates us, especially because of Iraq and we hate the E.U. The sooner we are out of stupid Union and Contest the better.